Summary
finding ALJ erred in failing to explain why RFC assessment did not adopt consultative psychiatrist's opined moderate limitations completing a normal workday or workweek due to Plaintiff's mental condition
Summary of this case from Flores v. SaulOpinion
CASE NO. 5:16-CV-01183-SK
04-17-2017
JUDGMENT
IT IS ADJUDGED that this action is reversed and remanded for further proceedings pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and consistent with the accompanying Opinion and Order. DATED: April 17, 2017
/s/_________
STEVE KIM
U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE