From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Barnes v. Colvin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 17, 2017
CASE NO. 5:16-CV-01183-SK (C.D. Cal. Apr. 17, 2017)

Summary

finding ALJ erred in failing to explain why RFC assessment did not adopt consultative psychiatrist's opined moderate limitations completing a normal workday or workweek due to Plaintiff's mental condition

Summary of this case from Flores v. Saul

Opinion

CASE NO. 5:16-CV-01183-SK

04-17-2017

MORRIS F. BARNES , Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


JUDGMENT

IT IS ADJUDGED that this action is reversed and remanded for further proceedings pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and consistent with the accompanying Opinion and Order. DATED: April 17, 2017

/s/_________

STEVE KIM

U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Barnes v. Colvin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 17, 2017
CASE NO. 5:16-CV-01183-SK (C.D. Cal. Apr. 17, 2017)

finding ALJ erred in failing to explain why RFC assessment did not adopt consultative psychiatrist's opined moderate limitations completing a normal workday or workweek due to Plaintiff's mental condition

Summary of this case from Flores v. Saul

finding ALJ erred in failing to explain why RFC assessment did not adopt consultative psychiatrist's moderate difficulties performing work activities on a consistent basis without special or additional supervision and moderate limitations completing a normal workday or workweek due to his mental condition

Summary of this case from Madrigal v. Saul
Case details for

Barnes v. Colvin

Case Details

Full title:MORRIS F. BARNES , Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Commissioner of Social…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Apr 17, 2017

Citations

CASE NO. 5:16-CV-01183-SK (C.D. Cal. Apr. 17, 2017)

Citing Cases

Madrigal v. Saul

Accordingly, the ALJ erred by not providing specific and legitimate reasons, supported by substantial…

Flores v. Saul

Accordingly, the ALJ erred by not providing specific and legitimate reasons, supported by substantial…