From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Barlow v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jun 20, 2001
786 So. 2d 1268 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

Opinion

No. 2D99-1568.

June 20, 2001.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Daniel L. Perry, Judge.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Joan Fowler, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Susan D. Dunlevy, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.


Derek Barlow appeals from the revocation of his community control. The sole issue he raises on appeal is whether the trial court erred in not entering a revocation order, citing Milbry v. State, 768 So.2d 524 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000). The State concedes error.

Barlow was charged with violating numerous conditions of community control. Although the trial court made an oral ruling as to the specific conditions that Barlow had violated, the court did not enter a written revocation order. Accordingly, pursuant to Milbry, we affirm the sentence imposed and reverse to the extent that the trial court must prepare a written order of the violations on remand.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.

NORTHCUTT and DAVIS, JJ., Concur.


Summaries of

Barlow v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jun 20, 2001
786 So. 2d 1268 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)
Case details for

Barlow v. State

Case Details

Full title:DEREK BARLOW, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Jun 20, 2001

Citations

786 So. 2d 1268 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)