From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Barkman v. Wilson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Dec 22, 2011
Civil Action: 11-cv-00257-WYD-CBS (D. Colo. Dec. 22, 2011)

Opinion

Civil Action: 11-cv-00257-WYD-CBS

12-22-2011

BETTY J. BARKMAN, GERALD E. HEAL Plaintiffs, v. BRIAN WILSON, MONTROSE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, KATHLEEN OZGA, and CAROL DEANGELIS, Defendants.


Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer

FTR - Reporter Deck-Courtroom A402

Courtroom Deputy: Laura Galera and Robin Mason

Parties:

Counsel:

Pro se (via phone)

Pro se (via phone)


Earl G. Rhodes


Timothy B. Jafek


COURTROOM MINUTES/MINUTE ORDER

HEARING: TELEPHONIC STATUS CONFERENCE

Court in Session: 3:06 p.m.

Court calls case. Appearances of counsel.

Discussion regarding MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim and Insufficient Service of Process (Docket No. 25, filed on 5/20/2011), First MOTION for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 36, filed on 8/5/2011), MOTION for Sanctions against Plaintiffs under Rule 11 and/or for Attorney Fees & Costs (Docket No. 39, filed on 9/14/2011), First MOTION to Amend/Correct/Modify #1 Complaint (Docket No. 49, filed on 11/16/2011), First MOTION to Supplement Pleadings (Docket No. 54, filed on 12/16/2011).

Plaintiff Barkman advises the court she would like to turn this into a R.I.C.O. case. Discussion between the court and plaintiffs regarding claims, merits of the case, statute of limitations, and qualified immunity. Discussion regarding the impact filing an amended Complaint could have on the progression of the case. Plaintiff considers requesting time to file an amended Complaint with the court and the potential of filing a Motion for Preliminary Injunctive Relief.

Discussion regarding possible time line for ruling on pending motions (referred and non-referred) and each party's argument pertaining to these motions.

The plaintiffs make an oral motion to withdraw the First Motion to Amend Complaint (Docket No. 49) and First Motion to Supplement Pleadings (Docket No. 54) and requests the original Complaint be the operative pleading. Defendants have no objection.

Discussion regarding Motion for Sanctions against Plaintiffs under Rule 11. Mr. Rhodes requests the court hold the Motion for Sanctions in abeyance until the First Motion for Summary Judgment has been ruled on.

Discussion between the court and Mr. Jafek regarding staying discovery and the court ordering the plaintiffs and county to engage in written discovery. Parties agree to stay the issue of discovery until non-referred motions have been ruled on (estimated to be before 3/31/2012).

ORDERED: MOTION for Sanctions against Plaintiffs under Rule 11 and/or for Attorney Fees & Costs (Docket No. 39, filed on 9/14/2011) is HELD IN ABEYANCE until the First Motion for Summary Judgment has been ruled on.

ORDERED: First MOTION to Amend/Correct/Modify #1 Complaint (Docket No. 49, filed on 11/16/2011) is WITHDRAWN.

ORDERED: First MOTION to Supplement pleadings (Docket No. 54, filed on 12/16/2011) is WITHDRAWN.

ORDERED: The issue of discovery shall be STAYED until non-referred motions have been ruled on.

HEARING CONCLUDED.

Court in recess: 4:12 p.m.

Total time in court: 01:06

To order transcripts of hearings with Magistrate Judge Shaffer, please contact Avery Woods Reporting at (303) 825-6119 or toll free at 1-800-962-3345.


Summaries of

Barkman v. Wilson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Dec 22, 2011
Civil Action: 11-cv-00257-WYD-CBS (D. Colo. Dec. 22, 2011)
Case details for

Barkman v. Wilson

Case Details

Full title:BETTY J. BARKMAN, GERALD E. HEAL Plaintiffs, v. BRIAN WILSON, MONTROSE…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Dec 22, 2011

Citations

Civil Action: 11-cv-00257-WYD-CBS (D. Colo. Dec. 22, 2011)