From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Barker v. Yassine

United States District Court, E.D. California
Sep 27, 2011
No. CIV S-11-0246 LKK GGH P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 27, 2011)

Opinion

No. CIV S-11-0246 LKK GGH P.

September 27, 2011


ORDER


Plaintiff has requested the appointment of counsel. The United States Supreme Court has ruled that district courts lack authority to require counsel to represent indigent prisoners in § 1983 cases. Mallard v. United States Dist. Court, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). In certain exceptional circumstances, the court may request the voluntary assistance of counsel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991); Wood v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1335-36 (9th Cir. 1990).

In the present case, the court does not find the required exceptional circumstances. The issues here are not complicated — plaintiff alleges an incident of excessive force which does not involve the need for expert testimony. And despite plaintiff's description of his inability to proceed with this lawsuit, the organization and structure of the complaint say otherwise. Plaintiff states that an attorney, Scott Hubbard, wants to take this case and the court should appoint him. If an attorney wishes to represent plaintiff then the attorney should file a notice of appearance. Plaintiff's request for the appointment of counsel will therefore be denied.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's request for the appointment of counsel (Docket No. 33) is denied.

DATED: September 26, 2011


Summaries of

Barker v. Yassine

United States District Court, E.D. California
Sep 27, 2011
No. CIV S-11-0246 LKK GGH P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 27, 2011)
Case details for

Barker v. Yassine

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM BARKER, Plaintiff, v. R. YASSINE, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Sep 27, 2011

Citations

No. CIV S-11-0246 LKK GGH P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 27, 2011)