From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Barker v. Yassine

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 22, 2011
No. CIV S-11-0246 LKK GGH P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 22, 2011)

Opinion

No. CIV S-11-0246 LKK GGH P

08-22-2011

WILLIAM BARKER, Plaintiff, v. R. YASSINE, Defendant.


ORDER

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, proceeds with a civil rights action. On July 27, 2011, defendants filed an answer to the complaint and a motion (Doc. 29) to depose plaintiff pursuant to Rule 30(a)(2)(B), as plaintiff is incarcerated.

As defendant has answered the complaint, a discovery and scheduling order will be filed concurrently with this order. In the discovery and scheduling order, defendant is notified that pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 30(a), defendant may depose plaintiff and any other witness confined in a prison upon condition that, at least fourteen days before such a deposition, defendant serve all parties with the notice required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 30(b)(1)

Nevertheless, defendant's motion to depose plaintiff is granted.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendant's motion to depose plaintiff (Doc. 29) is granted.

Gregory G. Hollows

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Barker v. Yassine

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 22, 2011
No. CIV S-11-0246 LKK GGH P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 22, 2011)
Case details for

Barker v. Yassine

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM BARKER, Plaintiff, v. R. YASSINE, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Aug 22, 2011

Citations

No. CIV S-11-0246 LKK GGH P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 22, 2011)