From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Barker v. Hund

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Jan 3, 2014
Civil Action No. 13-cv-02981-MSK-KLM (D. Colo. Jan. 3, 2014)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 13-cv-02981-MSK-KLM

01-03-2014

HELEN R. BARKER, Plaintiff, v. GUS HUND, doing business as Safeco Insurance doing business as Alllstate Insurance, and ERIC HUND, Defendants.


FINAL JUDGMENT

In accordance with the orders filed during the pendency of this case, and pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58(a), the following Final Judgment is hereby entered.

Pursuant to the ORDER ADOPTING [12] REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of Chief Judge Marcia S. Krieger entered on January 2, 2014 it is

ORDERED that judgment is entered against Plaintiff Helen Barker, who recovers nothing, the action is dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, and judgment is entered in favor of Defendants GUS HUND, doing business as Safeco Insurance doing business as Alllstate Insurance, and ERIC HUND. Defendants are AWARDED their costs, to be taxed by the Clerk of the Court pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(d)(1) and D.C.COLO.LCivR 54.1.

Dated at Denver, Colorado this 3rd day of January, 2014.

FOR THE COURT:

JEFFREY P. COLWELL, CLERK

By: __________

Edward P. Butler, Deputy Clerk


Summaries of

Barker v. Hund

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Jan 3, 2014
Civil Action No. 13-cv-02981-MSK-KLM (D. Colo. Jan. 3, 2014)
Case details for

Barker v. Hund

Case Details

Full title:HELEN R. BARKER, Plaintiff, v. GUS HUND, doing business as Safeco…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Jan 3, 2014

Citations

Civil Action No. 13-cv-02981-MSK-KLM (D. Colo. Jan. 3, 2014)