Barker v. G.D. Scarle LLC

Full title: John Barker, et al., Plaintiff, v. G.D. Scarle LLC, et al., Defendants.

Court: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Oct 7, 2011

Case Specific Number: 06-00057 CRB (N.D. Cal. Oct. 7, 2011)

Opinion

Case Specific Number: 06-00057 CRB

10-07-2011

John Barker, et al., Plaintiff, v. G.D. Scarle LLC, et al., Defendants.

Thomas P. Cartmell Brian J. Madden Thomas J. Preuss Wagstaff & Cartmell LLP J. Scott Bertram The Bertram Law Firm, LLC Wm. Dirk Vandever The Popham Law Firm, P.C. James P. Frickleton Bartimus, Frickleton, et al., Grant L. Davis Shawn G. Foster Davis Bethune & Jones, LLC DLA PIPER LLP (US) Defendants' Liaison Counsel

Charles R. Breyer

IN RE: BEXTRA AND CELEBREX MARKETING SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCT LIABILITY LITIGATION

MDL NO. 1699

District Judge:

STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE

Come now the Plaintiff, John Barker, individually and as Next of Kin of Deceased, Mary Barker, and Defendants, by and through the undersigned attorneys, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure, Rule 41(a), and hereby stipulate to the dismissal of this action without prejudice with each side bearing its own attorneys' fees andcpsts.

Thomas P. Cartmell

Brian J. Madden

Thomas J. Preuss

Wagstaff & Cartmell LLP

J. Scott Bertram

The Bertram Law Firm, LLC

Wm. Dirk Vandever

The Popham Law Firm, P.C.

James P. Frickleton

Bartimus, Frickleton, et al.,

Grant L. Davis

Shawn G. Foster

Davis Bethune & Jones, LLC

DLA PIPER LLP (US)

Defendants' Liaison Counsel

PURSUANT TO THE TERMS SET FORTH IN THE PARTIES' STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Hon. Charles R. Breyer

United States District Court