From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Barker v. Flowers

Court of Appeals of Texas, Seventh District, Amarillo, Panel A
Apr 22, 2010
No. 07-10-00140-CV (Tex. App. Apr. 22, 2010)

Opinion

No. 07-10-00140-CV

April 22, 2010.

Appealed from the 278th District Court of Walker County; Honorable Kenneth H. Keeling, Judge.

Before CAMPBELL and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


Appellant, Wayne Barker, filed a notice of appeal on March 16, 2010, in the Waco Court of Appeals. In his notice, he explains that he attempts to appeal from the 278th District Clerk's refusal to file his petition for writ of mandamus in the trial court.

On March 18, 2010, the Waco court sent a letter to Barker noting that, based on his notice of appeal, it appeared that it was without jurisdiction over his appeal. The court directed him to respond by showing how the court had jurisdiction and warned him that, unless grounds were shown to continue the appeal, his appeal would be dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c). He was given until April 8, 2010, to comply.

On April 8, 2010, pursuant to the Texas Supreme Court's docket equalization efforts, this case was transferred from the Waco Court of Appeals to this Court. See TEX. GOV'T CODE ANN. § 73.001 (Vernon 2005). To date, Barker has failed to respond to the letter directing him to show grounds for continuing this appeal.

Generally, only final judgments of trial courts are appealable. TEX. CIV. PRAC. REM. CODE ANN. § 51.012 (Vernon Supp. 2009); Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001). Barker asserts in his notice of appeal that there is no record in this case because the case was never filed. Therefore, naturally, there could be no final, appealable order for our review. Without a final, appealable order, we are without jurisdiction. Barker has failed to show how we otherwise have jurisdiction over this appeal.

Accordingly, we dismiss his appeal for want of jurisdiction.See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a).


Summaries of

Barker v. Flowers

Court of Appeals of Texas, Seventh District, Amarillo, Panel A
Apr 22, 2010
No. 07-10-00140-CV (Tex. App. Apr. 22, 2010)
Case details for

Barker v. Flowers

Case Details

Full title:WAYNE ERNEST BARKER, APPELLANT v. ROBYN FLOWERS AND MELISSA MIKES…

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Seventh District, Amarillo, Panel A

Date published: Apr 22, 2010

Citations

No. 07-10-00140-CV (Tex. App. Apr. 22, 2010)

Citing Cases

Scott v. Jackson Securities Investment Co.

The wives of the mortgagors were not necessary parties to the bill to foreclose, but were proper parties in…

Schley v. Cleaners Hanger Co.

When married woman joins her husband in mortgage of lands, legal title to which stands in name of husband,…