From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Barker v. Farooq

United States District Court, Central District of California
Nov 7, 2024
5:22-cv-00528-SVW-KES (C.D. Cal. Nov. 7, 2024)

Opinion

5:22-cv-00528-SVW-KES

11-07-2024

ANTHONY BARKER, Plaintiff, v. M. FAROOQ, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE

STEPHEN V. WILSON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the pleadings and all the records and files herein, along with the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (Dkt. 69). No objections to the Report and Recommendation were filed, and the deadline for filing such objections has passed. The Court accepts the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Judgment be entered (1) GRANTING R. Amis and E. Guzman's Motion to Dismiss the Third Amended Complaint (Dkt. 65), (2) DISMISSING all federal claims with prejudice, and (3) DISMISSING all state law claims without prejudice but without further leave to amend in this action.


Summaries of

Barker v. Farooq

United States District Court, Central District of California
Nov 7, 2024
5:22-cv-00528-SVW-KES (C.D. Cal. Nov. 7, 2024)
Case details for

Barker v. Farooq

Case Details

Full title:ANTHONY BARKER, Plaintiff, v. M. FAROOQ, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Nov 7, 2024

Citations

5:22-cv-00528-SVW-KES (C.D. Cal. Nov. 7, 2024)