From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Barker v. Colvin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Aug 16, 2016
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:15-CV-574 (M.D. Pa. Aug. 16, 2016)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:15-CV-574

08-16-2016

ALDON BARKER, Plaintiff v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant


( ) ORDER

AND NOW, this 16th day of August, 2016, upon consideration of the report (Doc. 17) of Chief Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson, recommending the court deny the appeal of Aldon Barker ("Barker") from the decision of the administrative law judge denying his claims for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income, and it appearing that Barker did not object to the report, see FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b)(2), and the court noting that failure of a party to timely object to a magistrate judge's conclusions "may result in forfeiture of de novo review at the district court level," Nara v. Frank, 488 F.3d 187, 194 (3d Cir. 2007) (citing Henderson v. Carlson, 812 F.2d 874, 878-79 (3d Cir. 1987)), but that, as a matter of good practice, a district court should "afford some level of review to dispositive legal issues raised by the report," Henderson, 812 F.2d at 878; see also Taylor v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec., 83 F. Supp. 3d 625, 626 (M.D. Pa. 2015) (citing Univac Dental Co. v. Dentsply Int'l, Inc., 702 F. Supp. 2d 465, 469 (M.D. Pa. 2010)), in order to "satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record," FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b), advisory committee notes, and, following an independent review of the record, the court in agreement with Judge Carlson's recommendation, and concluding that there is no clear error on the face of the record, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. The report (Doc. 17) of Chief Magistrate Judge Carlson is ADOPTED.

2. The decision of the Commissioner of Social Security ("Commissioner") denying the application for supplemental security income and disability insurance benefits of Aldon Barker ("Barker") is AFFIRMED.

3. The Clerk of Court shall enter judgment in favor of the Commissioner and against Barker as set forth in paragraph 2.

4. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case.

/S/ CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER

Christopher C. Conner, Chief Judge

United States District Court

Middle District of Pennsylvania


Summaries of

Barker v. Colvin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Aug 16, 2016
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:15-CV-574 (M.D. Pa. Aug. 16, 2016)
Case details for

Barker v. Colvin

Case Details

Full title:ALDON BARKER, Plaintiff v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Aug 16, 2016

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:15-CV-574 (M.D. Pa. Aug. 16, 2016)