From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Barker v. California Dep't of Corr.

The United States District Court Eastern District Of California
Aug 25, 2011
Case No. 2:08-cv-1160 WBS-CKD P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 25, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. 2:08-cv-1160 WBS-CKD P

08-25-2011

William Barker, Plaintiff, v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, et al., Defendants.

DISABLED ADVOCACY GROUP, APLC Scottlynn J Hubbard IV Attorney for Plaintiff Erin Sullivan California Attorney General's Office Counsel for Defendants


Lynn Hubbard III, SBN 69773

Scottlynn J Hubbard IV, SBN 212970

Disabled Advocacy Group, APLC

12 Williamsburg Lane

Chico, CA 95926

Telephone: (530) 895-3252

Facsimile: (530) 894-8244

Attorneys for Plaintiff

Stipulation for Extension of Time to

File an Opposition to Respond to

Defendants' Motion to Dismiss

WHEREAS, on August 22, 2011, the Court ordered that plaintiff file an opposition or statement of non-opposition to defendants' 07/29/11 motion to dismiss within 14 days;

WHEREAS, on August 23, 2011, the parties conferred and agreed to extend the deadline for plaintiff's opposition;

WHEREAS, Plaintiff's counsel is in trial for the next 3 weeks and therefore is not able to prepare his reply by the court deadline;

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and among the parties hereto that the time for plaintiff to file his opposition to defendants' motion to dismiss be extended by 3 weeks as follows:

(1) On or before September 26, 2011, Plaintiff shall file an opposition or statement of non-opposition to defendants' July 29, 2011 motion to dismiss; and;
(2) Defendants may file a reply within seven days of service of plaintiff's opposition.

DISABLED ADVOCACY GROUP, APLC

Scottlynn J Hubbard IV

Attorney for Plaintiff

Erin Sullivan

California Attorney General's Office

Counsel for Defendants

ORDER

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

(1) On or before September 26, 2011, Plaintiff shall file an opposition or statement of non-opposition to defendants' July 29, 2011 motion to dismiss; and;
(2) Defendants may file a reply within seven days of service of plaintiff's opposition.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES

MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Barker v. California Dep't of Corr.

The United States District Court Eastern District Of California
Aug 25, 2011
Case No. 2:08-cv-1160 WBS-CKD P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 25, 2011)
Case details for

Barker v. California Dep't of Corr.

Case Details

Full title:William Barker, Plaintiff, v. California Department of Corrections and…

Court:The United States District Court Eastern District Of California

Date published: Aug 25, 2011

Citations

Case No. 2:08-cv-1160 WBS-CKD P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 25, 2011)