From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

BARK v. SULLIVAN

United States District Court, E.D. California
Dec 29, 2005
No. CIV S-05-1710 LKK KJM P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 29, 2005)

Opinion

No. CIV S-05-1710 LKK KJM P.

December 29, 2005


ORDER


Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254, together with a request to proceed in forma pauperis.

The application attacks a conviction issued by the Pomona Superior Court. While both this Court and the United States District Court in the district where petitioner was convicted have jurisdiction, see Braden v. 30th Judicial Circuit Court, 410 U.S. 484 (1973), any and all witnesses and evidence necessary for the resolution of petitioner's application are more readily available in Los Angeles County. Id. at 499 n. 15; 28 U.S.C. § 2241(d).

Accordingly, in the furtherance of justice, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. This court has not ruled on petitioner's application to proceed in forma pauperis; and

2. This matter is transferred to the United States District Court for the Central District of California.


Summaries of

BARK v. SULLIVAN

United States District Court, E.D. California
Dec 29, 2005
No. CIV S-05-1710 LKK KJM P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 29, 2005)
Case details for

BARK v. SULLIVAN

Case Details

Full title:ERIC ALFRED BARK, Petitioner, v. J.W. SULLIVAN, et al., Respondents

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Dec 29, 2005

Citations

No. CIV S-05-1710 LKK KJM P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 29, 2005)