From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Baris v. Sulpicio Lines, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Nov 26, 1996
101 F.3d 367 (5th Cir. 1996)

Summary

affirming decision of district court by equally divided vote

Summary of this case from Thompson v. Florida Bar

Opinion

No. 94-20498.

November 26, 1996.

Michael J. Maloney, Wayne Dell Fisher, Houston, TX, Christopher Tramonte, A. Glenn Diddel, III, The Diddel Law Firm, Houston, TX, for plaintiffs-appellees.

Bruce Dixie Smith, John A. Barrett, Houston, TX, Charles Alan Wright, University of Texas Law School, Austin, TX, Richard Jeffrey Zook, Fulbright Jaworski, Houston, TX, for defendants-appellants.

Brice McAdoo Clagett, Washington, D.C., Joanne Barbara Grossman, John F. Duffy, Covington Burling, Washington, D.C., for Amer Petro Inst. and Aerospace Industries Association of America.

G. William Jarman, Gordon Damian Polozola, Kean, Miller, Hawthorne, D'Armond, McCowan Jarman, Baton Rouge, LA, for Louisiana Mid-Continent Oil Gas, Ass'n and Associated Equipment Company.

Ted Catlett Litton, Houston, TX, for Steamship Mutual Underwriting Association.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Kenneth M. Hoyt, Judge.

Prior Report: 74 F.3d 567

Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, and GARWOOD, JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, JONES, SMITH, DUHE, WIENER, BARKSDALE, EMILIO M. GARZA, DeMOSS, BENAVIDES, STEWART, PARKER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

Judge Carolyn D. King is recused and did not participate in this decision.


FOR THE COURT:

By virtue of an equally divided en banc court, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Baris v. Sulpicio Lines, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Nov 26, 1996
101 F.3d 367 (5th Cir. 1996)

affirming decision of district court by equally divided vote

Summary of this case from Thompson v. Florida Bar
Case details for

Baris v. Sulpicio Lines, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:VICTOR C. BARIS, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLEES, v. SULPICIO LINES, INC., ET…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit

Date published: Nov 26, 1996

Citations

101 F.3d 367 (5th Cir. 1996)

Citing Cases

Jefferson v. Cmty. Bank (In re Jefferson)

However, Weissinger is not controlling due, in part, to subsequent amendments to Rule 41(b) and the…

Jefferson v. Cmty. Bank (In re Jefferson)

However, Weissinger is not controlling due, in part, to subsequent amendments to Rule 41(b) and the…