From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Barger v. Goord

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jan 30, 2003
301 A.D.2d 1001 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

92200

January 30, 2003.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Gordon Barger, Moravia, petitioner pro se.

Eliot Spitzer, Attorney General, Albany (Nancy A. Spiegel of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Cardona, P.J., Crew III, Peters, Carpinello and, Kane, JJ.


MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT

Substantial evidence in the record supports the determination finding petitioner guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rule against unauthorized possession of a controlled substance. The misbehavior report and testimony at the hearing established that three bags of a white powdery substance, later identified by laboratory tests as heroin, were found on petitioner's desk. It was for the Hearing Officer to resolve any conflict in testimony as to whether petitioner's cell door remained open while he was away from his cell thereby allowing another inmate to possibly plant the drugs on petitioner's desk (see Matter of Mendez v. Jones, 176 A.D.2d 423). To the extent that petitioner claims he did not observe the entire search of his cell, testimony established that the correction officer who authored the misbehavior report motioned for petitioner's cell to be opened and petitioner was immediately escorted to his cell. Although there is conflicting testimony as to whether the search began prior to petitioner arriving at the cell, this created a credibility issue for the Hearing Officer to resolve (see Matter of Smith v. Selsky, 294 A.D.2d 629). In view of the foregoing, we reject petitioner's contention that he was denied the right to view the search of his cell (see Matter of Morales v. Selsky, 297 A.D.2d 894). Even if preserved for our review, we would find petitioner's remaining contentions, including his challenge to the chain of custody of the heroin, to be without merit.

Cardona, P.J., Crew III, Peters, Carpinello and Kane, JJ., concur.

ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.


Summaries of

Barger v. Goord

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jan 30, 2003
301 A.D.2d 1001 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

Barger v. Goord

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of GORDON BARGER, Petitioner, v. GLENN S. GOORD, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jan 30, 2003

Citations

301 A.D.2d 1001 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
753 N.Y.S.2d 408