From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Barger v. Federal Bureau of Investigation

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Apr 8, 2013
1:13-cv-00414-LJO-SAB (E.D. Cal. Apr. 8, 2013)

Opinion


GARY DALE BARGER, Plaintiff, v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, Defendant. No. 1:13-cv-00414-LJO-SAB United States District Court, E.D. California. April 8, 2013

ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT WITH LEAVE TO AMEND ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIF TO PAY FILING FEE OR TO FILE APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

STANLEY A BOONE, Magistrate Judge.

Plaintiff Gary Dale Barger ("Plaintiff") is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this action against Defendant Federal Bureau of Investigation ("Defendant"). For the reasons set forth below, the Court will dismiss Plaintiff's complaint with leave to amend and order Plaintiff to pay the filing fee for this action or file an application to proceed in forma pauperis.

I.

SCREENING

The Court must screen all complaints "in which a prisoner seeks redress from a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity." 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). "On review, the court shall identify cognizable claims or dismiss the complaint, or any portion of the complaint, if the complaint... is frivolous, malicious, or fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted; or... seeks monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief." 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b).

Plaintiff's three page complaint is entitled "United States Lawsuit Under U.S. Law Title 5 U.S.C. § 552(a)(4)(B) Freedom of Information Act Withholding Information." (Compl. 1.) Plaintiff alleges that he received an inadequate response to his request for information under the Freedom of Information Act ("FOIA"). (Compl. 1) It is unclear what Plaintiff requested, who he made the request to or what response he received. However, Plaintiff vaguely alleges that his request "is not an invasion of personal privacy of a 3rd party." (Compl. 1 (underlining in original).) Plaintiff accuses Defendant of "dragging their feet" and claims that "what [he is] looking for is the source and nature of the investigation." (Compl. 2.) Plaintiff provides no further details regarding this "investigation."

Under "Relief Sought, " Plaintiff identifies himself as "the legal heir to the Hell's Angel M/C." (Compl. 2.) Plaintiff further writes:

It is my belief that I seek the truth in the information that I am looking for and in 16 pages given to me it (information not once) gave me any indication of who the leaders were, the x-president was publically known to having a recent case out of where I chose to run the Hell's Angels Motorcycle Clubs functions in Ventura California.

(Compl. 2-3.) Plaintiff seeks $100,000.00 "for lack of information under 5 U.S.C. § 552(a)(4)(B). (Compl. 3.)

"The FOIA, generally, provides for the mandatory disclosure of information held by federal agencies, unless the requested material is exempt from mandatory disclosure by one of the nine exemption provisions in the FOIA." St. Michael's Convalescent Hospital v. State of Cal., 643 F.2d 1369, 1372 (9th Cir. 1981). Under 5 U.S.C. § 552(a)(4)(B), a person making a FOIA request may file a complaint in district court to enjoin an agency from withholding records and order the production of any records improperly withheld from the complainant.

Plaintiff's complaint fails to clearly allege (1) whether Plaintiff made a FOIA request, (2) to whom Plaintiff sent the FOIA request, (3) what information Plaintiff requested in his FOIA request, (4) what response, if any, Plaintiff received from his FOIA request and (5) how the federal agency's response to Plaintiff's FOIA request was improper. The Court will dismiss Plaintiff's complaint with leave to file an amended complaint that provides the necessary details outlined above.

Moreover, Plaintiff seeks $100,000 in monetary damages, but monetary damages are not authorized under FOIA. O'Toole v. IRS, 52 Fed.Appx. 961, 962 (9th Cir. 2002). Plaintiff's complaint does not clearly ask for any other form of relief. Accordingly, Plaintiff's complaint does not state a valid FOIA claim. Id. If Plaintiff opts to amend, he must seek relief that is available under FOIA, e.g., an order enjoining the federal agency from withholding records sought by Plaintiff.

II.

FILING FEES

Plaintiff has failed to pay the filing fee in this action and did not file an application to proceed in forma pauperis without prepayment of his filing fee. Accordingly, the Court will order Plaintiff to pay his filing fee or to file an application to proceed in forma pauperis within thirty days of the date of this order. Plaintiff is forewarned that if he fails to pay the filing fee and does not file an application to proceed in forma pauperis, the Court will dismiss this action without prejudice for failure to pay the filing fee.

III.

CONCLUSION AND ORDER

Based upon the foregoing, the Court finds that Plaintiff's complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Plaintiff's complaint will be dismissed with leave to amend. If Plaintiff fails to file an amended complaint, this action will be dismissed with prejudice.

Moreover, Plaintiff has failed to pay the filing fee in this action. If Plaintiff fails to pay the filing fee and fails to file an application to proceed in forma pauperis, the Court will dismiss this action without prejudice for failing to pay the filing fee.

Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff's complaint is dismissed, with leave to amend, for failure to state a claim;

2. Plaintiff shall file an amended complaint within thirty (30) days of the date of this order;

3. Within thirty (30) days of the date of this order, Plaintiff shall either (1) pay the $350.00 filing fee for this action, or (2) file an application to proceed in forma pauperis without prepayment of the fee; and

4. The Clerk of the Court is directed to forward an in forma pauperis application to Plaintiff.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Barger v. Federal Bureau of Investigation

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Apr 8, 2013
1:13-cv-00414-LJO-SAB (E.D. Cal. Apr. 8, 2013)
Case details for

Barger v. Federal Bureau of Investigation

Case Details

Full title:GARY DALE BARGER, Plaintiff, v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Apr 8, 2013

Citations

1:13-cv-00414-LJO-SAB (E.D. Cal. Apr. 8, 2013)