From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Barfield v. Lehman Brothers Bank FSB

United States District Court, D. Nevada
Feb 24, 2010
2:08-cv-001032-RCJ-PAL (D. Nev. Feb. 24, 2010)

Opinion

2:08-cv-001032-RCJ-PAL.

February 24, 2010


ORDER


Before the Court for consideration is the (#35) Report of Findings and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen, filed January 21, 2010. No opposition has been filed.

The Court has conducted a review of the record in this case and determines that the Report of Findings and Recommendation (#35) of the United States Magistrate Judge entered January 21, 2010, should be affirmed. As such,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's complaint against the only remaining defendant, Title Court Services, Inc., is DISMISSED for their failure to prosecute their claims; failure to respond to the Notice of Intent to Dismiss (#25); failure to keep the court advised of their current address; and failure to respond to the Order to Show Cause (#33).


Summaries of

Barfield v. Lehman Brothers Bank FSB

United States District Court, D. Nevada
Feb 24, 2010
2:08-cv-001032-RCJ-PAL (D. Nev. Feb. 24, 2010)
Case details for

Barfield v. Lehman Brothers Bank FSB

Case Details

Full title:JAMES D. BARFIELD, et al., Plaintiffs, v. LEHMAN BROTHERS BANK FSB, et…

Court:United States District Court, D. Nevada

Date published: Feb 24, 2010

Citations

2:08-cv-001032-RCJ-PAL (D. Nev. Feb. 24, 2010)