Opinion
2:21-cv-00084-RFB-NJK
01-28-2022
DINA BARELA, individually. Plaintiff, v. USAA CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, DOES 1 through 20, ROE BUSINESS ENTITIES I through 20, inclusive jointly and severally, Defendants.
LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP Attorneys for Defendant USAA CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY ROBERT W. FREEMAN PRISCILLA L. O'BRIANT JENNIFER A. TAYLOR Attorneys for Defendant USAA CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY RICHARD HARRIS LAW Samantha A. Martin, Esq. Attorneys for Plaintiff Dina Barela
LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP Attorneys for Defendant USAA CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
ROBERT W. FREEMAN PRISCILLA L. O'BRIANT JENNIFER A. TAYLOR Attorneys for Defendant USAA CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
RICHARD HARRIS LAW Samantha A. Martin, Esq. Attorneys for Plaintiff Dina Barela
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff DINA BARELA (“Barela”) and Defendant USAA CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY (“Defendant”), by and through their respective undersigned counsel, that all claims in the above-entitled action against Defendant shall be dismissed in their entirety, with prejudice, each party to bear its own costs and attorneys' fees.
DATED this 25th day of January, 2022.
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.