From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Barela v. Northrop Grumman Sys. Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Nov 3, 2011
Civil Action No. 10-cv-02616-RPM (D. Colo. Nov. 3, 2011)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 10-cv-02616-RPM

11-03-2011

DAVID BARELA, Plaintiff, v. NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION, Defendant.


Senior District Judge

Date: November 3, 2011

Courtroom Deputy: J. Chris Smith

FTR Technician: Kathy Terasaki

Donna E. Dell'Olio

Patricia A. Fennelly

COURTROOM MINUTES

Hearing on Pending Motions

1:51 p.m. Court in session.

Court's preliminary remarks. Court's statement regarding the issue of plaintiff 's technical competents to perform assigned duties and evaluators. Ms. Fennelly answers questions asked by the Court regarding Mr. Martin and discovery.
Ms. Fennelly states Mr. Martin is now retired from Northrop Grumman Systems, Corp.
2:06 p.m. Argument by Ms. Dell'Olio.
2:14 p.m. Argument by Ms. Fennelly.

ORDERED: Mr. Martin and Laura Black's depositions shall be taken at the defendant's expense.

2:24 p.m. Further argument by Ms. Dell'Ollio.

ORDERED: Plaintiff's Motion to Compel and for Sanctions [15], is denied.

Unopposed Motion to Modify Scheduling Order to Extend Expert Witness Deadline for Good Cause [16], is granted.

2:26 p.m. Court in recess. Hearing concluded. Total time: 35 min.


Summaries of

Barela v. Northrop Grumman Sys. Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Nov 3, 2011
Civil Action No. 10-cv-02616-RPM (D. Colo. Nov. 3, 2011)
Case details for

Barela v. Northrop Grumman Sys. Corp.

Case Details

Full title:DAVID BARELA, Plaintiff, v. NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Nov 3, 2011

Citations

Civil Action No. 10-cv-02616-RPM (D. Colo. Nov. 3, 2011)