Opinion
No. 296CA 21-01009
06-03-2022
DINA BARDSLEY AND MICHAEL BARDSLEY, HER HUSBAND, INDIVIDUALLY, AND AS CLASS REPRESENTATIVE PLAINTIFFS, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. GREAT LAKES INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT, LLC, AND INDUSTRIAL MATERIALS RECYCLING, LLC, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS. (APPEAL NO. 2.)
VINAL & VINAL, P.C., BUFFALO (JEANNE M. VINAL OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS. NIXON PEABODY LLP, ROCHESTER (ZACHARY C. OSINSKI OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT GREAT LAKES INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT, LLC. GOLDBERG SEGALLA LLP, BUFFALO (MEGHAN M. BROWN OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT INDUSTRIAL MATERIALS RECYCLING, LLC.
VINAL & VINAL, P.C., BUFFALO (JEANNE M. VINAL OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS.
NIXON PEABODY LLP, ROCHESTER (ZACHARY C. OSINSKI OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT GREAT LAKES INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT, LLC.
GOLDBERG SEGALLA LLP, BUFFALO (MEGHAN M. BROWN OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT INDUSTRIAL MATERIALS RECYCLING, LLC.
PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., SMITH, CENTRA, NEMOYER, AND WINSLOW, JJ.
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Timothy J. Walker, A.J.), dated May 10, 2021. The order, among other things, granted the motion of plaintiffs insofar as it sought leave to reargue their prior motion for class certification and, upon reargument, adhered to the prior order denying plaintiffs' motion for class certification.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.
Same memorandum as in Bardsley v Great Lakes Indus. Dev., LLC ([appeal No. 1] __ A.D.3d __ [] [4th Dept 2022]).