From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bardo v. Martel

United States District Court, E.D. California
May 3, 2011
No. CIV S-09-3479 FCD EFB P (E.D. Cal. May. 3, 2011)

Opinion

No. CIV S-09-3479 FCD EFB P.

May 3, 2011


ORDER


Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On March 8, 2011, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed March 8, 2011, are adopted in full; and

2. Plaintiff's February 15, 2011 request for a temporary restraining order is denied as moot.

DATED: May 2, 2011.


Summaries of

Bardo v. Martel

United States District Court, E.D. California
May 3, 2011
No. CIV S-09-3479 FCD EFB P (E.D. Cal. May. 3, 2011)
Case details for

Bardo v. Martel

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT J. BARDO, Plaintiff, v. M. MARTEL, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: May 3, 2011

Citations

No. CIV S-09-3479 FCD EFB P (E.D. Cal. May. 3, 2011)