From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bardo v. Martel

United States District Court, E.D. California
Dec 10, 2010
No. CIV S-09-3479 FCD EFB P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 10, 2010)

Opinion

No. CIV S-09-3479 FCD EFB P.

December 10, 2010


ORDER


Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On October 20, 2010, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed October 20, 2010, are adopted in full; and

2. Plaintiff's claims against all remaining defendants — Green, Chamberlin, Knipp, Martel, Pimental, McCloughan, Machado, Long, Porter, Clendenin, Lackner, Garcia, Chambers, Kaplan, Vanni, Wilson, Phillips, Reyes, Hutchins, Batchelor, Purviance, Luck, Islas, Dobler, Woolbright, Stewart, Thomas and Bueno — are dismissed without prejudice.

DATED: December 9, 2010.


Summaries of

Bardo v. Martel

United States District Court, E.D. California
Dec 10, 2010
No. CIV S-09-3479 FCD EFB P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 10, 2010)
Case details for

Bardo v. Martel

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT J. BARDO, Plaintiff, v. M. MARTEL, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Dec 10, 2010

Citations

No. CIV S-09-3479 FCD EFB P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 10, 2010)