From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bardo v. Clark

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Aug 3, 2021
19-00759 BLF (PR) (N.D. Cal. Aug. 3, 2021)

Opinion

19-00759 BLF (PR)

08-03-2021

MARIO JOSEPH BARDO, Petitioner, v. KEN CLARK, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME AS UNNECESSARY

(Docket No. 58)

BETH LABSON FREEMAN United States District Judge

On May 17, 2021, the Court granted Respondent's motion, and dismissed the amended petition as untimely and for failure to exhaust state remedies. Dkt. No. 54. In the same order, the Court also denied a certificate of appealability. Id. at 11. Judgment was entered the same day. Dkt. No. 55. The Court denied Petitioner's motion for reconsideration. Dkt. No. 57. Accordingly, Petitioner's motion for an extension of time to file a certificate of appealability is DENIED as unnecessary. Since this matter is now on appeal, Petitioner should seek a certificate of appealability directly with the Ninth Circuit. This order terminates Docket No. 58.

IT IS SO ORDERED


Summaries of

Bardo v. Clark

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Aug 3, 2021
19-00759 BLF (PR) (N.D. Cal. Aug. 3, 2021)
Case details for

Bardo v. Clark

Case Details

Full title:MARIO JOSEPH BARDO, Petitioner, v. KEN CLARK, Warden, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Aug 3, 2021

Citations

19-00759 BLF (PR) (N.D. Cal. Aug. 3, 2021)