From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bardfield v. Chisholm Properties Circuit Events

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division
Jun 4, 2010
Case No. 3:09cv232/MCR/EMT (N.D. Fla. Jun. 4, 2010)

Opinion

Case No. 3:09cv232/MCR/EMT.

June 4, 2010


ORDER


This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation dated May 4, 2010 (Doc. 86). The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of any timely filed objections.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objections thereto timely filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. Plaintiffs' motion for entry of default judgment against Defendant Chisholm (Doc. 60) is DENIED. DONE AND ORDERED.


Summaries of

Bardfield v. Chisholm Properties Circuit Events

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division
Jun 4, 2010
Case No. 3:09cv232/MCR/EMT (N.D. Fla. Jun. 4, 2010)
Case details for

Bardfield v. Chisholm Properties Circuit Events

Case Details

Full title:STEPHEN BARDFIELD and CHARLES CARVER, Plaintiffs, v. CHISHOLM PROPERTIES…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division

Date published: Jun 4, 2010

Citations

Case No. 3:09cv232/MCR/EMT (N.D. Fla. Jun. 4, 2010)

Citing Cases

Tranter v. Unknown (In re Tranter)

Second, after a default has been entered, a party may then move - pursuant to Rule 55(b) - for entry of a…

Brantley v. Drug Enf't Admin.

Thus, that motion was due to be denied on that basis. See Bardfield v. Chisholm Properties Circuit Events,…