Barden v. Union for Reform Judaism

Full title: DOUGLAS E. BARDEN, Appellant. v. UNION FOR REFORM JUDAISM, Respondent…

Court: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Date published: Dec 10, 2015

2015 N.Y. Slip Op. 9155 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)

Opinion

520740

12-10-2015

DOUGLAS E. BARDEN, Appellant. v. UNION FOR REFORM JUDAISM, Respondent. COMMISSIONER OF LABOR, Respondent.

Douglas E. Barden, Ridgefield, Connecticut, appellant pro se. Kane Kessler, PC, New York City (Robert L. Sacks of counsel), for Union for Reform Judaism, respondent. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, New York City (Linda D. Joseph of counsel), for Commissioner of Labor, respondent.

Lahtinen, J.P., Garry, Rose and Devine, JJ., concur.

Before: Lahtinen, J.P., Garry, Rose and Devine, JJ.

Douglas E. Barden, Ridgefield, Connecticut, appellant pro se.

Kane Kessler, PC, New York City (Robert L. Sacks of counsel), for Union for Reform Judaism, respondent.

Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, New York City (Linda D. Joseph of counsel), for Commissioner of Labor, respondent.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed June 16, 2014, which ruled, among other things, that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because he voluntarily left his employment without good cause.

Decision affirmed. No opinion.

Lahtinen, J.P., Garry, Rose and Devine, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that the decision is affirmed, without costs.