From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bard v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE.
Dec 8, 2020
618 S.W.3d 594 (Mo. Ct. App. 2020)

Opinion

No. ED 108816

12-08-2020

Chad T. BARD, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Abraham P. Copi, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, Mo. 63101, for appellant. Karen L. Kramer, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO. 65102, for respondent.


Abraham P. Copi, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, Mo. 63101, for appellant.

Karen L. Kramer, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO. 65102, for respondent.

Before Angela T. Quigless, P.J.; Kurt S. Odenwald, J.; and James M. Dowd, J.

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Chad T. Bard appeals the circuit court's denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. An opinion would have no precedential value. We have furnished the parties with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision. The circuit court's findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b)(2)&(5).


Summaries of

Bard v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE.
Dec 8, 2020
618 S.W.3d 594 (Mo. Ct. App. 2020)
Case details for

Bard v. State

Case Details

Full title:Chad T. BARD, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE.

Date published: Dec 8, 2020

Citations

618 S.W.3d 594 (Mo. Ct. App. 2020)