From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bard v. Davis

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Western Division
Jun 27, 2024
5:23-cv-00202-JGC (N.D. Ohio Jun. 27, 2024)

Opinion

5:23-cv-00202-JGC

06-27-2024

DAVID PAUL BARD, Petitioner, v. WARDEN ANTHONY DAVIS, Respondent.


ORDER

James G. Carr Sr. U.S. District Judge

This is a petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. I referred the petition to Magistrate Judge James E. Grimes Jr. for a Report and Recommendation, which Judge Grimes has filed (Doc. 11). In that Report and Recommendation, Judge Grimes duly notified the petitioner of the deadline for filing objections. That time has passed without the petitioner having filed timely objections.

On de novo review, I find the Report and Recommendation well-taken in all respects.

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED THAT:

1. The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 11) be, and the same hereby is, adopted as the order of this Court; and
2. The petition be, and the same hereby is, dismissed with prejudice.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Bard v. Davis

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Western Division
Jun 27, 2024
5:23-cv-00202-JGC (N.D. Ohio Jun. 27, 2024)
Case details for

Bard v. Davis

Case Details

Full title:DAVID PAUL BARD, Petitioner, v. WARDEN ANTHONY DAVIS, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Western Division

Date published: Jun 27, 2024

Citations

5:23-cv-00202-JGC (N.D. Ohio Jun. 27, 2024)