From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Barcus v. State Emp. Ret. Bd.

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Aug 1, 1983
76 Pa. Commw. 62 (Pa. Cmmw. Ct. 1983)

Summary

In Barcus, this court interpreted identical language appearing in section 5304(b) of the State Employees' Retirement Code, 71 Pa. C. S. § 5304(b).

Summary of this case from Morris v. Pa. Pub. Sch. Emp. Ret. Sys

Opinion

Argued May 11, 1983

August 1, 1983.

Public employees — Retirement — State Employes' Retirement Code, 71 Pa. C. S. § 5304(b) — Nonstate service.

1. Under the State Employes' Retirement Code, 71 Pa. C. S. § 5304(b), a state employee is entitled to have her retirement account in the Pennsylvania Public School Employes' Retirement System credited for years of nonstate service performed in another state. [63]

Argued May 11, 1983, before President Judge CRUMLISH, JR. and Judges WILLIAMS, JR. and BARBIERI, sitting as a panel of three.

Appeal, No. 804 C.D. 1982, from the Order of the State Employes' Retirement Board in the case of In Re: Claim of Virginia F. Barcus, S.S. No. 571-28-0964, dated March 24, 1982.

Request to the State Employes' Retirement Board for credit for nonstate service. Request denied. Employee appealed to the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania. Held: Reversed.

Mark P. Widoff, Widoff, Reager, Selkowitz Adler, P.C., for petitioner.

Nickolas J. Marcucci, Counsel, with him Marsha V. Mills, Assistant Chief Counsel, for respondent.


Virginia F. Barcus (Petitioner) appeals here from an order of the State Employees' Retirement Board (Board) denying her request to have certain nonstate service credited to her retirement account. We reverse.

The facts in this case are not in dispute. Petitioner was employed from September 11, 1956 until August 16, 1963 in the California public school system, and had 5.034 years of service credited to her retirement account in the State Teachers Retirement System of California. Petitioner subsequently withdrew her contributions from this retirement system, attended graduate school in Massachusetts, and, after working at a number of jobs in Massachusetts and New Hampshire, commenced working for the Pennsylvania Department of Education. Thereafter, on March 3, 1981, Petitioner petitioned the Board to credit her retirement account in the Pennsylvania Public School Employees' Retirement System (System) with the 5.034 years of nonstate service she performed in California. Such credits for nonstate service are authorized by Section 5304(b) of the State Employees' Retirement Code, 71 Pa. C. S. § 5304(b), which provides in pertinent part as follows:

(b) An active member . . . shall be eligible to receive credit for nonstate service provided that he does not have credit for such service in the school system and is not entitled to receive, eligible to receive now or in the future, or is receiving retirement benefits for such services under a retirement system administered and wholly or partially paid for by any other governmental agency . . . and further provided, that such service is certified by the previous employer and contributions are agreed upon and made in accordance with Section 5505 (relating to contributions for the purchase of credit for creditable nonstate service). (Emphasis added.)

After conducting a hearing, however, the Board denied Petitioner's request on the ground that Petitioner was disqualified from receiving nonstate credit by the portion of Section 5304(b) italicized above, since she could return to California, obtain a job in the California public school system, and repurchase credit for the time she had previously served. The present appeal followed.

The only issue in this appeal is whether the Board erred as a matter of law by concluding that Section 5304(b) prohibits credit for nonstate service to those members of the System who, upon the occurrence of certain contingent circumstances, could qualify for retirement benefits in another state's retirement system.

In its brief to this Court, the Board argues that the phrase "eligible to receive now or in the future" found in Section 5304(b) prohibits the award of credit for nonstate service to those individuals who (1) are currently eligible for benefits in another state's retirement system or (2) could become eligible to receive such benefits at some point in the future. In the context of the sentence in which this phrase is found, however, it is clear that the phrase merely disqualifies those individuals who currently are eligible for benefits in an out-of-state retirement system, whether those benefits are currently being received or will be paid in the future. This interpretation is consistent with the obvious intention of the General Assembly to prevent individuals from receiving credit in two retirement systems for the same service, see Section 1921(c)(4) of the Statutory Construction Act of 1972 (Act), 1 Pa. C. S. § 1921(c)(4), and avoids the absurd result of disqualifying all members of the System from receiving nonstate credit, which would occur if we adopted the Board's interpretation of Section 5304(b). See Section 1922(1) of the Act, 1 Pa. C. S. § 1922(1). Such an interpretation would also, of course, make Section 5304(b) a nullity. See Section 1922(2) of the Act, 1 Pa. C.S. § 1922(2).

Therefore, we must reverse.

ORDER

NOW, August 1, 1983, the order of the State Employees' Retirement Board dated March 24, 1982, is reversed, and the State Employees' Retirement Board is hereby directed to permit Virginia F. Barcus to purchase credit for her nonstate service in accordance with the provisions of 5304(b) of the State Employees' Retirement Code, 71 Pa. C. S. § 5304(b).


Summaries of

Barcus v. State Emp. Ret. Bd.

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Aug 1, 1983
76 Pa. Commw. 62 (Pa. Cmmw. Ct. 1983)

In Barcus, this court interpreted identical language appearing in section 5304(b) of the State Employees' Retirement Code, 71 Pa. C. S. § 5304(b).

Summary of this case from Morris v. Pa. Pub. Sch. Emp. Ret. Sys

In Barcus, this court concluded that Ms. Barcus was entitled to purchase, for her retirement account in the Pennsylvania Public School Employees' Retirement System, credit for 5.034 years of out-of-state service which she accumulated while teaching in California.

Summary of this case from Cook v. Pub. Sch. Emp. Retirement Bd.
Case details for

Barcus v. State Emp. Ret. Bd.

Case Details

Full title:Virginia F. Barcus, Petitioner v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, State…

Court:Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Date published: Aug 1, 1983

Citations

76 Pa. Commw. 62 (Pa. Cmmw. Ct. 1983)
463 A.2d 490

Citing Cases

Morris v. Pa. Pub. Sch. Emp. Ret. Sys

" Petitioner argues that because he must repay the contributions he withdrew when he left federal government…

Cook v. Pub. Sch. Emp. Retirement Bd.

Before the hearing examiner, the parties agreed to stipulate the facts. Relying upon Barcus v. Commonwealth,…