From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Barclays Bank v. Strathmore Five Realty

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 28, 1999
262 A.D.2d 591 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

Argued May 10, 1999

June 28, 1999

In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (D'Emilio, J.), dated December 16, 1998, which granted the motion of the defendant Alfred Barone to vacate a deficiency judgment entered against him on March 12, 1998.

Rick, Steiner, P.C., New York, N.Y. (Jack Segal of counsel), for appellant.

Neal J. Roher, Huntington, N.Y., for respondent.

LAWRENCE J. BRACKEN, J.P., CORNELIUS J. O'BRIEN, WILLIAM C. THOMPSON, THOMAS R. SULLIVAN, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the appellant's argument, the Supreme Court was not precluded, as a matter of law, from granting the motion of the defendant Alfred Barone to vacate an improper deficiency judgment entered against him on March 12, 1998 ( see, CPLR 5015[a][5]; Ciminelli Constr. Co. v. City of Buffalo, 110 A.D.2d 1075, 1076; Barclays Bank of N.Y. v. Strathmore Five Realty Co., 245 A.D.2d 406).

The appellant's remaining contentions are without merit.


Summaries of

Barclays Bank v. Strathmore Five Realty

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 28, 1999
262 A.D.2d 591 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

Barclays Bank v. Strathmore Five Realty

Case Details

Full title:BARCLAYS BANK OF NEW YORK, N.A., appellant, v. STRATHMORE FIVE REALTY CO.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 28, 1999

Citations

262 A.D.2d 591 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
691 N.Y.S.2d 892