From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Barclay v. State

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Dec 5, 2013
2:13-cv-1489 GGH P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 5, 2013)

Opinion


JEFFREY BARCLAY, Petitioner, v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Respondent. No. 2:13-cv-1489 GGH P United States District Court, E.D. California. December 5, 2013

          ORDER

          GREGORY G. HOLLOWS, District Judge.

         Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254.

         In conjunction with an opposition to respondent's request for extension of time, petitioner included a request for summary judgment. (ECF No. 12.) The request is merely a statement, and contains no motion, statement of disputed and undisputed facts, briefing or evidence as required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56 and E.D. Local Rule 260.

         Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner's motion for summary judgment, filed November 14, 2013 (ECF No. 12), is denied without prejudice to a later review of the merits.


Summaries of

Barclay v. State

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Dec 5, 2013
2:13-cv-1489 GGH P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 5, 2013)
Case details for

Barclay v. State

Case Details

Full title:JEFFREY BARCLAY, Petitioner, v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Dec 5, 2013

Citations

2:13-cv-1489 GGH P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 5, 2013)