From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Barclay v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Nov 3, 2011
CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-478 (E.D. Pa. Nov. 3, 2011)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-478.

November 3, 2011


ORDER


AND NOW, this 3rd day of November, 2011, upon careful and independent consideration of the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Docket No. 3), as well as the various Motions filed by Petitioner, and after review of United States Magistrate M. Faith Angell's Report and Recommendation (Docket No. 21), to which Petitioner has filed no Objections, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows:

1. The Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Angell is APPROVED and ADOPTED.
2. Petitioner's Motion to Strike (Docket No. 13) is DENIED.
3. Petitioner's Motion for Entry of Default Judgment (Docket No. 14) is DENIED.
4. Petitioner's Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 16) is DENIED.
5. Petitioner's Motion to Compel (Docket No. 19) is DENIED.
6. The Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE based on Petitioner's failure to exhaust available state court remedies.
7. Because Petitioner has failed to make a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right or to demonstrate that a reasonable jurist would debate the correctness of this ruling, the Court declines to issue a certificate of appealability under 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2).
8. The Clerk shall CLOSE this case statistically.


Summaries of

Barclay v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Nov 3, 2011
CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-478 (E.D. Pa. Nov. 3, 2011)
Case details for

Barclay v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania

Case Details

Full title:LLOYD VIRGIL BARCLAY v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, et al

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Nov 3, 2011

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-478 (E.D. Pa. Nov. 3, 2011)

Citing Cases

Posey v. Bickel

Petitioner's conviction became final 30 days after February 28, 2005, the date on which the Pennsylvania…

Hill v. Kerestes

28 U.S.C. § 2244(d). In this case, Petitioner's conviction became final on September 13, 2007, i.e., thirty…