From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Barboza v. Yates

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 29, 2008
No. 1:05-cv-01403 ALA HC (E.D. Cal. Feb. 29, 2008)

Opinion

No. 1:05-cv-01403 ALA HC.

February 29, 2008


ORDER


Petitioner Rumaldo Barboza is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On February 19, 2008, this court ordered petitioner to file a traverse. On February 28, 2008, petitioner notified the court that he was unable to comply with the court's February 19, 2008, order because he had not received respondent's December 3, 2007, answer. As such, respondent will be ordered to serve a copy of the December 3, 2007, answer on the petitioner.

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Respondent shall serve petitioner with a copy of the December 3, 2007, answer within twenty-eight (28) days of the date of this order; and

2. Petitioner shall file a traverse within fifty-six (56) days of the date of this order.


Summaries of

Barboza v. Yates

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 29, 2008
No. 1:05-cv-01403 ALA HC (E.D. Cal. Feb. 29, 2008)
Case details for

Barboza v. Yates

Case Details

Full title:RUMALDO BARBOZA, Petitioner, v. JAMES A. YATES, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Feb 29, 2008

Citations

No. 1:05-cv-01403 ALA HC (E.D. Cal. Feb. 29, 2008)