From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Barbour v. Western Regional Director

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
May 19, 2009
324 F. App'x 282 (4th Cir. 2009)

Opinion

No. 08-8544.

Submitted: April 29, 2009.

Decided: May 19, 2009.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Senior District Judge. (7:08-cv-00598-JCT-MFU).

Kenneth Edward Barbour, Appellant Pro Se.

Before TRAXLER, KING, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


Kenneth Edward Barbour appeals the district court's order consolidating his eight 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaints and dismissing them without prejudice, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A (b)(1) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's order. Barbour v. Western Reg'l Dir., No. 7:08-cv-00598-JCT-MFU, 2008 WL 5062126 (W.D.Va. Nov. 26, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Barbour v. Western Regional Director

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
May 19, 2009
324 F. App'x 282 (4th Cir. 2009)
Case details for

Barbour v. Western Regional Director

Case Details

Full title:Kenneth Edward BARBOUR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WESTERN REGIONAL DIRECTOR…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: May 19, 2009

Citations

324 F. App'x 282 (4th Cir. 2009)

Citing Cases

Tynes v. McCree

See e.g., Barbour v. W. Reg'l Dir. VDOC, C/A No. 7:08-cv-00598, 2008 WL 5062126, at *5 (W.D. Va. Nov. 26,…

Muhammad v. Virginia

Muhammad's difficulty exercising his "right" to administrative exhaustion therefore is not a cognizable…