From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Barbour v. Kimberly-Clark Corporation

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 6, 1942
264 App. Div. 824 (N.Y. App. Div. 1942)

Opinion

May 6, 1942.

Present — Crosby, P.J., Taylor, Dowling, Harris and McCurn, JJ.


Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. All concur. (The order denies defendant's motion to resettle a previous order which denies defendant's motion to dismiss plaintiff's amended complaint in a silicosis action.)


Summaries of

Barbour v. Kimberly-Clark Corporation

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 6, 1942
264 App. Div. 824 (N.Y. App. Div. 1942)
Case details for

Barbour v. Kimberly-Clark Corporation

Case Details

Full title:LADELL BARBOUR, Respondent, v. KIMBERLY-CLARK CORPORATION, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: May 6, 1942

Citations

264 App. Div. 824 (N.Y. App. Div. 1942)