From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Barbera v. WMC Mortgage Corporation

United States District Court, N.D. California, Oakland Division
Jun 5, 2008
No. C 08-02677 PJH (N.D. Cal. Jun. 5, 2008)

Opinion

No. C 08-02677 PJH.

June 5, 2008


ORDER [Docket No. 7]


On June 3, 2008, WMC Mortgage Corp. and GE Consumer Finance, Inc. filed an Administrative Motion to Consider Whether Cases Should Be Related. [Docket No. 6]. In it, they requested that case C 04-03728 be related to C 08-02677. On the same day, they filed a Request for Judicial Notice in Support of their Motion to Consider Whether Cases Should Be Related. [Docket No. 7]. In it, they requested that the Court take notice, under Federal Rule of Evidence 201, of a number of pleadings filed in the San Francisco Superior Court or the Northern District, either in this case, the case requested to be related, or cases related to the latter. Because the pleadings are not subject to reasonable dispute under Rule 201(b), the Court GRANTS the request for judicial notice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Barbera v. WMC Mortgage Corporation

United States District Court, N.D. California, Oakland Division
Jun 5, 2008
No. C 08-02677 PJH (N.D. Cal. Jun. 5, 2008)
Case details for

Barbera v. WMC Mortgage Corporation

Case Details

Full title:PATRICIA C. BARBERA, Plaintiff, v. WMC MORTGAGE CORPORATION, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. California, Oakland Division

Date published: Jun 5, 2008

Citations

No. C 08-02677 PJH (N.D. Cal. Jun. 5, 2008)

Citing Cases

Cousin v. Sharp Healthcare

Although Plaintiffs offer some additional facts in their opposition, including that Meta's business model…