From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

BARBERA v. J F H MAK TRUCKING, INC.

United States District Court, E.D. New York
Jun 14, 2007
98 CV 7291 (SJ) (RLM) (E.D.N.Y. Jun. 14, 2007)

Opinion

98 CV 7291 (SJ) (RLM).

June 14, 2007

FRIEDMAN WOLF, New York, NY, By: Michael Bauman, Esq., Attorney for Plaintiffs.


ORDER


Before the Court is a Report and Recommendation (the "Report"), prepared by Magistrate Judge Roanne L. Mann. Judge Mann filed the Report on November 15, 2006, and provided the parties with the requisite amount of time to file any objections. No objections were filed.

A district court judge may designate a magistrate judge to hear and determine certain motions pending before the Court and to submit to the Court proposed findings of fact and a recommendation as to the disposition of the motion. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within 10 days of service of the recommendation, any party may file written objections to the magistrate's report. Id. Upon de novo review of those portions of the record to which objections were made, the district court judge may affirm or reject the recommendations.Id. The Court is not required to review, under a de novo or any other standard, the factual or legal conclusions of the magistrate judge as to those portions of the report and recommendation to which no objections are addressed. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 150 (1985).

As mentioned, no objections were filed within the allotted time period. Upon review, the Court adopts and affirms the Report in its entirety. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close the case.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

BARBERA v. J F H MAK TRUCKING, INC.

United States District Court, E.D. New York
Jun 14, 2007
98 CV 7291 (SJ) (RLM) (E.D.N.Y. Jun. 14, 2007)
Case details for

BARBERA v. J F H MAK TRUCKING, INC.

Case Details

Full title:GARY LA BARBERA, LAWRENCE KUDLA, DENNIS GARTLAND, THOMAS GESUALDI…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. New York

Date published: Jun 14, 2007

Citations

98 CV 7291 (SJ) (RLM) (E.D.N.Y. Jun. 14, 2007)