From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Barber v. William

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Jun 10, 2016
2:16-cv-01234-JAD-VCF (D. Nev. Jun. 10, 2016)

Opinion

2:16-cv-01234-JAD-VCF

06-10-2016

Edward Barber, Petitioner v. Brian William, et al., Respondents


Order Denying Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis and Dismissing Case without Prejudice [ECF No. 1]

On May 31, 2016, Edward Barber filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis, but he has not submitted an accompanying habeas petition. Barber's IFP application shows that he is able to pay the $5 filing fee for a habeas action, so I deny his application for pauper status. And because Barber has not filed a habeas petition or any other initiating document in this case, I dismiss this case without prejudice. Barber is instructed that if he wishes to file a habeas petition in this court, he must initiate a new action, use the approved form for use by a pro se petitioner, and pay the $5 filing fee in full. If Barber is unable to pay the full filing fee, he must submit a new application to proceed in forma pauperis that demonstrates his inability to do so.

ECF No. 1. --------

Conclusion

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Barber's application to proceed in forma pauperis [ECF No. 1] is DENIED, and this action is DISMISSED without prejudice.

The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment accordingly and CLOSE THIS CASE.

Dated this 10th day of June, 2016.

/s/_________

Jennifer A. Dorsey

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Barber v. William

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Jun 10, 2016
2:16-cv-01234-JAD-VCF (D. Nev. Jun. 10, 2016)
Case details for

Barber v. William

Case Details

Full title:Edward Barber, Petitioner v. Brian William, et al., Respondents

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Jun 10, 2016

Citations

2:16-cv-01234-JAD-VCF (D. Nev. Jun. 10, 2016)