From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Barber v. Adam Unknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHEASTERN DIVISION
Mar 2, 2017
Case No. 5:15-cv-01664-LSC-SGC (N.D. Ala. Mar. 2, 2017)

Opinion

Case No. 5:15-cv-01664-LSC-SGC

03-02-2017

DONALD JOE BARBER, Plaintiff, v. ADAM UNKNOWN, WARDEN POTTER, and DEPUTY CAMPBELL, Defendants.


MEMORANDUM OPINION

The magistrate judge filed a report on February 3, 2017, recommending the defendants' motions for summary judgment be treated as motions to dismiss pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a) for failure to exhaust administrative remedies and that the same be granted. (Doc. 56). Although the parties were advised of their right to file specific written objections within fourteen days, no objections have been received by the court.

Having carefully reviewed and considered de novo all the materials in the court file, including the report and recommendation, the magistrate judge's report is hereby ADOPTED and the recommendation is ACCEPTED. Accordingly, the court ORDERS that the defendants' motions for summary judgment be construed as motions to dismiss pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a) for failure to exhaust administrative remedies and the same be GRANTED and the claims be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

A final judgment will be entered separately.

DONE AND ORDERED ON MARCH 2, 2017.

/s/_________

L. SCOTT COOGLER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

160704


Summaries of

Barber v. Adam Unknown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHEASTERN DIVISION
Mar 2, 2017
Case No. 5:15-cv-01664-LSC-SGC (N.D. Ala. Mar. 2, 2017)
Case details for

Barber v. Adam Unknown

Case Details

Full title:DONALD JOE BARBER, Plaintiff, v. ADAM UNKNOWN, WARDEN POTTER, and DEPUTY…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHEASTERN DIVISION

Date published: Mar 2, 2017

Citations

Case No. 5:15-cv-01664-LSC-SGC (N.D. Ala. Mar. 2, 2017)