From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Barber v. Stauch

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 1, 1916
173 App. Div. 998 (N.Y. App. Div. 1916)

Opinion

May, 1916.


Judgment affirmed, with costs, but without prejudice to another action upon the same claim if plaintiff is so advised. Held, the plaintiff, having consented to an adjournment, was not entitled to judgment as of course, although his complaint was verified, without making proof of his cause of action, an answer having thereafter been filed containing a general denial. All concurred.


Summaries of

Barber v. Stauch

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 1, 1916
173 App. Div. 998 (N.Y. App. Div. 1916)
Case details for

Barber v. Stauch

Case Details

Full title:John Barber, Appellant, v. Jane Stauch, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: May 1, 1916

Citations

173 App. Div. 998 (N.Y. App. Div. 1916)