From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Barber v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE.
Aug 10, 2021
626 S.W.3d 928 (Mo. Ct. App. 2021)

Opinion

No. ED 109073

08-10-2021

Joseph BARBER, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Defendant/Respondent.

Susan A. DeGeorge, 1010 Market St. Ste. 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101, For Movant/Appellant. Shaun J. Mackelprang, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, For Defendant/Respondent.


Susan A. DeGeorge, 1010 Market St. Ste. 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101, For Movant/Appellant.

Shaun J. Mackelprang, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, For Defendant/Respondent.

Before Philip M. Hess, P.J., Angela T. Quigless, J., and Colleen Dolan, J.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Joseph Barber ("Movant") appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 post-conviction relief motion after an evidentiary hearing. Movant asserts three points on appeal. Finding the trial court did not clearly err, we affirm.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, we have provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Barber v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE.
Aug 10, 2021
626 S.W.3d 928 (Mo. Ct. App. 2021)
Case details for

Barber v. State

Case Details

Full title:Joseph BARBER, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri…

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE.

Date published: Aug 10, 2021

Citations

626 S.W.3d 928 (Mo. Ct. App. 2021)

Citing Cases

Barber v. Hancock

Barber v. State, 626 S.W.3d 928 (Mo.Ct.App. 2021) (per curiam) (Resp. Ex. J, ECF No.…