From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Barber v. Jewel Tea Co.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 24, 1938
16 N.E.2d 94 (N.Y. 1938)

Opinion

Argued April 18, 1938

Decided May 24, 1938

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.

John A. Slade for Jewel Tea Co., Inc., appellant.

John J. O'Malley for Gerald Bennett, appellant.

Charles L. Hoey and Clarence B. Kilmer for respondents.


In each action: judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: HUBBS, LOUGHRAN, FINCH and RIPPEY, JJ. Dissenting as to Jewel Tea Co., Inc.: LEHMAN and O'BRIEN, JJ. Taking no part: CRANE, Ch. J.


Summaries of

Barber v. Jewel Tea Co.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 24, 1938
16 N.E.2d 94 (N.Y. 1938)
Case details for

Barber v. Jewel Tea Co.

Case Details

Full title:MARION G. BARBER, Respondent, v. JEWEL TEA CO., INC., et al., Appellants…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: May 24, 1938

Citations

16 N.E.2d 94 (N.Y. 1938)
16 N.E.2d 94

Citing Cases

Leotta v. Plessinger

" ( Fullerton v. Motor Express, supra, pp. 175-176; emphasis supplied; see, also, the automobile registration…

Haase v. City of Buffalo

We think they do. McCarthy disobeyed no instructions. The requirements of his employment that day had…