From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Barber v. Hous. Cnty.

DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION
Apr 23, 2020
CIVIL ACT. NO. 1:19-cv-1043-ECM (WO) (M.D. Ala. Apr. 23, 2020)

Opinion

CIVIL ACT. NO. 1:19-cv-1043-ECM (WO)

04-23-2020

BRENT R. BARBER, Plaintiff, v. HOUSTON COUNTY, et al., Defendants.


OPINION and ORDER

On March 26, 2020, the Magistrate Judge entered a Recommendation (doc. 9) to which no timely objections have been filed. After an independent review of the file and upon consideration of the Recommendation, it is

ORDERED that the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED, and this case is DISMISSED without prejudice for the Plaintiff's failure to file an amended complaint as ordered by the Court and to prosecute this action.

A separate Final Judgment will be entered.

Done this 23rd day of April, 2020.

/s/ Emily C. Marks

EMILY C. MARKS

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Barber v. Hous. Cnty.

DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION
Apr 23, 2020
CIVIL ACT. NO. 1:19-cv-1043-ECM (WO) (M.D. Ala. Apr. 23, 2020)
Case details for

Barber v. Hous. Cnty.

Case Details

Full title:BRENT R. BARBER, Plaintiff, v. HOUSTON COUNTY, et al., Defendants.

Court:DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Apr 23, 2020

Citations

CIVIL ACT. NO. 1:19-cv-1043-ECM (WO) (M.D. Ala. Apr. 23, 2020)