From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Barber v. Florida Industrial Commission

Supreme Court of Florida
Jul 10, 1964
166 So. 2d 142 (Fla. 1964)

Opinion

No. 33075.

July 10, 1964.

Writ of Certiorari to the Florida Industrial Commission.

James T. Earle and Masterson Lloyd, St. Petersburg, for petitioner.

E.O. Palermo of Shackleford, Farrior, Stallings, Glos Evans, Tampa, for Clark and Clark and The Fidelity and Casualty Co. of New York.

Patrick H. Mears, Tallahassee and J. Franklin Garner, Lakeland, for Florida Industrial Commission.


Upon a consideration of the record, briefs and after oral argument, we have concluded that the Florida Industrial Commission committed no error in remanding the matter to the Deputy Commissioner for a re-examination of the extent of the petitioner's permanent disability. The writ of certiorari is, therefore, denied.

It is so ordered.

DREW, C.J., and ROBERTS, THORNAL, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Barber v. Florida Industrial Commission

Supreme Court of Florida
Jul 10, 1964
166 So. 2d 142 (Fla. 1964)
Case details for

Barber v. Florida Industrial Commission

Case Details

Full title:LEROY BARBER, PETITIONER, v. FLORIDA INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION, CLARK CLARK…

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Jul 10, 1964

Citations

166 So. 2d 142 (Fla. 1964)