Barber v. Fla. Dep't of Corr.

Full title: Larry BARBER, Petitioner, v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Respondent.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Date published: Dec 19, 2017

234 So. 3d 815 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

Opinion

CASE NO. 1D17–1376

12-19-2017

Larry BARBER, Petitioner, v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Respondent.

Larry Barber, pro se, Petitioner. Kenneth S. Steely, General Counsel, and Gayla Grant, Assistant General Counsel, Department of Corrections, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Larry Barber, pro se, Petitioner.

Kenneth S. Steely, General Counsel, and Gayla Grant, Assistant General Counsel, Department of Corrections, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari is denied because the lower court's denial of the mandamus petition did not constitute a departure from the essential requirements of law. To the extent petitioner challenges the lower court's imposition of a lien on his inmate trust account, that claim is not preserved because petitioner failed to raise it below. See Kemp v. McDonough, 955 So.2d 635, 637 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007).

WOLF, WINOKUR, and JAY, JJ., CONCUR.