Barber v. Burns

Full title: DARIEN BARBER, Petitioner, v. DANIEL P. BURNS, Respondent.

Court: United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Feb 5, 2024

Civil Action 13-cv-1636 (E.D. Pa. Feb. 5, 2024)

Opinion

Civil Action 13-cv-1636

02-05-2024

DARIEN BARBER, Petitioner, v. DANIEL P. BURNS, Respondent.

MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG, J.

ORDER

MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG, J.

AND NOW, this 5^th day of February, 2024, upon consideration of the Report and

Recommendation by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth T. Hey, to which no objections were filed within the time required by Local Civil Rule 72.1 IV(b), it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 54) is APPROVED AND ADOPTED.¹

1 A district judge is only required to review “those portions of the report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is made.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). However, I have reviewed the Report and Recommendation and determined it to be correct. See Henderson v. Carlson, 812 F.2d 874, 878 (3d Cir. 1987).

2. The petition for a writ of habeas corpus (ECF No. 1) is DENIED. There is no basis to issue a certificate of appealability.

3. The Clerk of Court shall mark this case closed.

BY THE COURT: