From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Barbato v. Bank of Am.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Sep 13, 2022
22-cv-04233-KMK (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 13, 2022)

Opinion

22-cv-04233-KMK

09-13-2022

ROBERT P. BARBATO and, GINA M. BARBATO PLAINTIFF, v. BANK OF AMERICA N.A., AS SUCCESSOR TO COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS, INC., COUNTRYWIDE FINANCIAL CORPORATION, and, COUNTRYWIDE, COLLECTIVELY and THE REGISTERED TRADEMARK “AMERICA'S WHOLESALE LENDER”, COLLECTIVELY, NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, LLC, dba, MR COOPER, LAKEVIEW LOAN SERVICING, LLC. DEFENDANTS.

David M. Schlachter, Esq. LAW OFFICES OF DAVID M. SCHLACHTER, LLC Attorneys for Plaintiffs


David M. Schlachter, Esq. LAW OFFICES OF DAVID M. SCHLACHTER, LLC Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Plaintiff, ROBERT P. BARBATO and, GINA M. Barbato by their undersigned counsel, LAW OFFICES OF DAVID M. SCHLACHTER, LLC, oppose the Order to Show Cause as follows:

I, David M. Schlachter, Esq., attorney for Plaintiffs, does state the facts as true under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, as follows:

1. Plaintiffs did file a summons to be issued.
2. First the ecf had to be corrected and then the summons had to be corrected.
3. A corrected summons has been sent for issuance by the Clerk.
4. Once it is filed and executed it with the Complaint will be served upon the Defendants.
5. There has been no prejudice to any party thus far.

This filing is unresponsive. In the Order to Show Cause dated June 3, 2022, the Court ordered Plaintiffs to show cause as to why this Action should not be dismissed for lack of personal jurisdiction. (Dkt. No. 4.) As the Court pointed out, the Complaint contains "very few allegations linking either Defendants or the conduct at issue to the State of New York, raising serious questions as to personal jurisdiction." (Id. at 1.) Plaintiffs are again directed to show cause, by no later than September 9, 2022, as to why this Action should not be dismissed for lack of personal jurisdiction. See Sinoying Logistics Pte Ltd. v. Yi Da Xin Trading Corp., 619 F.3d 207, 214 (2d Cir. 2010) (affirming district court's sua sponte dismissal of case due to lack of personal jurisdiction where the defendant declined to appear). There will be no extensions.


Summaries of

Barbato v. Bank of Am.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Sep 13, 2022
22-cv-04233-KMK (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 13, 2022)
Case details for

Barbato v. Bank of Am.

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT P. BARBATO and, GINA M. BARBATO PLAINTIFF, v. BANK OF AMERICA N.A.…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Sep 13, 2022

Citations

22-cv-04233-KMK (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 13, 2022)