From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Barbaro Techs. v. Niantic, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Jul 9, 2021
No. 2021-1249 (Fed. Cir. Jul. 9, 2021)

Opinion

2021-1249

07-09-2021

BARBARO TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant v. NIANTIC, INC., Defendant-Appellee

JORDAN A. SIGALE, Dunlap Codding, PC, Chicago, IL, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by JULIE LANGDON; DOUGLAS SOROCCO, EVAN W. TALLEY, Oklahoma City, OK. LUANN LORAINE SIMMONS, O'Melveny &Myers LLP, San Francisco, CA, argued for defendant-appellee. Also represented by DARIN W. SNYDER, BILL TRAC; BRADLEY GARCIA, Washington, DC.


This disposition is nonprecedential.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California in No. 3:18-cv-02955-RS, Judge Richard Seeborg.

JORDAN A. SIGALE, Dunlap Codding, PC, Chicago, IL, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by JULIE LANGDON; DOUGLAS SOROCCO, EVAN W. TALLEY, Oklahoma City, OK.

LUANN LORAINE SIMMONS, O'Melveny &Myers LLP, San Francisco, CA, argued for defendant-appellee. Also represented by DARIN W. SNYDER, BILL TRAC; BRADLEY GARCIA, Washington, DC.

JUDGMENT

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM

MOORE, Chief Judge, LINN and O'MALLEY, Circuit Judges.

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.


Summaries of

Barbaro Techs. v. Niantic, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Jul 9, 2021
No. 2021-1249 (Fed. Cir. Jul. 9, 2021)
Case details for

Barbaro Techs. v. Niantic, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:BARBARO TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant v. NIANTIC, INC.…

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Jul 9, 2021

Citations

No. 2021-1249 (Fed. Cir. Jul. 9, 2021)