Barbaro Techs. v. Niantic, Inc.

Full title: BARBARO TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant v. NIANTIC, INC.…

Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Jul 9, 2021

No. 2021-1249 (Fed. Cir. Jul. 9, 2021)

Opinion

2021-1249

07-09-2021

BARBARO TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant v. NIANTIC, INC., Defendant-Appellee

JORDAN A. SIGALE, Dunlap Codding, PC, Chicago, IL, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by JULIE LANGDON; DOUGLAS SOROCCO, EVAN W. TALLEY, Oklahoma City, OK. LUANN LORAINE SIMMONS, O'Melveny &Myers LLP, San Francisco, CA, argued for defendant-appellee. Also represented by DARIN W. SNYDER, BILL TRAC; BRADLEY GARCIA, Washington, DC.

PER CURIAM

This disposition is nonprecedential.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California in No. 3:18-cv-02955-RS, Judge Richard Seeborg.

JORDAN A. SIGALE, Dunlap Codding, PC, Chicago, IL, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by JULIE LANGDON; DOUGLAS SOROCCO, EVAN W. TALLEY, Oklahoma City, OK.

LUANN LORAINE SIMMONS, O'Melveny &Myers LLP, San Francisco, CA, argued for defendant-appellee. Also represented by DARIN W. SNYDER, BILL TRAC; BRADLEY GARCIA, Washington, DC.

JUDGMENT

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM

MOORE, Chief Judge, LINN and O'MALLEY, Circuit Judges.

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.