From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Barash v. PSI Industries, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jun 2, 1999
733 So. 2d 1119 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

Opinion

No. 98-4090

Opinion filed June 2, 1999

Appeal of a non-final order from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Kathleen J. Kroll, Judge, L.T. No. CL 98-4958 AG.

Michael W. Marcil and John P. Kelly of Gunster, Yoakley, Valdes-Fauli Stewart, P.A., Ft. Lauderdale, for appellant.

Elliot H. Scherker and Susan F. Kornspan of Greenberg Traurig, P.A., Miami and West Palm Beach, for appellee.


Appellant Jonathan Barash seeks review of a temporary injunction to the extent that it enjoined him from competing with PSI Industries. He argues that such relief was not requested. We agree and remand for the trial court to strike that portion of the order as enforcement of the noncompete provision of the confidentiality agreement was not before the trial court. See e.g. Williford v. Melbourne Commercial Dev., Inc., 682 So.2d 1234 (Fla.5th DCA 1996).

We note that Barash also argues that the $1,000.00 bond ordered is inadequate. The trial court may reconsider the amount of bond upon Barash's filing of an appropriate motion.

Accordingly, we remand for proceedings consistent with this opinion.

WARNER, STEVENSON and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Barash v. PSI Industries, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jun 2, 1999
733 So. 2d 1119 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)
Case details for

Barash v. PSI Industries, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:JONATHAN BARASH, Appellant, v. PSI INDUSTRIES, INC., Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Jun 2, 1999

Citations

733 So. 2d 1119 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

Citing Cases

Florida Digestive Health Specialists, LLP v. Colina

On remand, the court should strike that portion of the order. See Barash v. PSI Indus., Inc., 733 So.2d 1119,…

Florida Digestive Health Specialists, LLP v. Colina

On remand, the court should strike that portion of the order. See Barash v. PSI Indus., Inc., 733 So.2d 1119,…