From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Baranek v. Barane

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Jun 19, 2013
107 A.D.3d 886 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)

Opinion

2013-06-19

In the Matter of Karin BARANEK, respondent, v. Mark BARANEK, appellant.


Mark Baranek, Smithtown, N.Y., appellant pro se.

In a child support proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 4, the father appeals from an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County (Hoffman, J.), dated November 22, 2011, which denied his motion, in effect, to enforce an order of the same court dated September 20, 2011, so as to direct the Suffolk County Department of Social Services to refrain from enforcing an order of support of the same court (Buse, S.M.), dated July 6, 2009, made after a hearing.

ORDERED that the order dated November 22, 2011, is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Under the circumstances of this case, and contrary to the appellant's contention, the Family Court properly determined that the continued enforcement of the appellant's child support obligations as set forth in a valid order of support dated July 6, 2009, was not barred by the terms of a subsequent order ( seeFamily Ct. Act §§ 413; 461).

The appellant's remaining contentions are either without merit or not properly before this Court.

DILLON, J.P., ANGIOLILLO, CHAMBERS and HINDS–RADIX, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Baranek v. Barane

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Jun 19, 2013
107 A.D.3d 886 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
Case details for

Baranek v. Barane

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Karin BARANEK, respondent, v. Mark BARANEK, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Jun 19, 2013

Citations

107 A.D.3d 886 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 4599
966 N.Y.S.2d 870