From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Baranchuk v. Steppingstone Assets Grp.

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Dec 8, 2021
21-cv-00274-KAW (N.D. Cal. Dec. 8, 2021)

Opinion

21-cv-00274-KAW

12-08-2021

NATALYA BARANCHUK, Plaintiff, v. STEPPINGSTONE ASSETS GROUP LLC, et al., Defendants.


ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

RE: DKT. NO. 36

KANDIS A. WESTMORE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

On November 22, 2021, Defendant filed a motion to dismiss. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-3(a), Plaintiff s opposition was due 14 days after the motion was filed, which was December 6, 2021.

To date, Plaintiff has not filed an opposition or statement of non-opposition. Pursuant to the undersigned's standing order, “[t]he failure of the opposing party to file a memorandum of points and authorities in opposition to any motion shall constitute consent to the granting of the motion.” (Judge Westmore's General Standing Order ¶ 23.)

Accordingly, Plaintiff is ordered, on or before December 23, 2021, 1) to file an opposition or statement of non-opposition to the pending motion, and 2) to file a response to this order to show cause explaining why the opposition was not timely filed. Should an opposition be filed, Defendant may file a reply on or before January 4, 2022.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Baranchuk v. Steppingstone Assets Grp.

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Dec 8, 2021
21-cv-00274-KAW (N.D. Cal. Dec. 8, 2021)
Case details for

Baranchuk v. Steppingstone Assets Grp.

Case Details

Full title:NATALYA BARANCHUK, Plaintiff, v. STEPPINGSTONE ASSETS GROUP LLC, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Dec 8, 2021

Citations

21-cv-00274-KAW (N.D. Cal. Dec. 8, 2021)