Baral v. Bombard

2 Citing cases

  1. In re A.E.T.

    No. M2015-01193-COA-R3-PT (Tenn. Ct. App. Jul. 26, 2016)   Cited 2 times

    2004) (see also State ex rel. Taylor v. Taylor, No. W2004-02589-COA-R3-JV, 2006 WL 618291, at *1-2 (Tenn. Ct. App., filed Mar. 13, 2006)). Previously, we considered Tenn. R. Civ. P. 8.01 in our analysis of a matter filed in juvenile court in Baral v. Bombard, No. M2000-02429-COA-R3-JV, 2002 WL 1256246, at *8 (Tenn. Ct. App., filed June 5, 2002). C.

  2. State, Dept of Child v. D.D.T.

    No. M2006-00671-COA-R3-PT (Tenn. Ct. App. Jul. 31, 2006)   Cited 3 times

    Abandonment of the child is recognized "as a situation where a child's welfare is sufficiently threatened to justify state intervention and the termination of parental rights." Baral v. Bombard, No. M2000-02429-COA-R3-JV, 2002 WL 1256246, at *3 (Tenn.Ct.App. June 5, 2002). A key component of the statutory ground of abandonment is the element of wilfulness. Willful conduct "consists of acts or failures to act that are intentional or voluntary rather than accidental or inadvertent."